In an effort to make better hiring decisions, many organisations have gradually added more and more interview stages to their recruitment processes. Phone screens, AI questioning, technical assessments, panel interviews, culture-fit interviews, final stakeholder reviews – the list keeps growing. While thoroughness is important, an overly complex interview process often does more harm than good.
Too many interview stages can negatively impact candidates, hiring teams, and ultimately the business itself.
Top candidates are usually in high demand. When a recruitment process stretches across multiple weeks or even months, candidates can become disengaged or withdraw altogether. Long processes signal bureaucracy and indecision, which may push candidates toward companies that move faster and appear more confident in their hiring decisions.
Candidate fatigue also affects performance. A candidate who is enthusiastic in the first two interviews may appear less engaged by the fifth, not because they are a poor fit, but because the process has become exhausting. This can lead to misjudging strong talent.
Speed matters in hiring. Organisations with lengthy interview pipelines often lose top candidates to competitors who can make decisions quickly. Even candidates who prefer your company may accept another offer simply because it arrives first.
In competitive markets, a slow process is not neutral, it actively works against you.
Each additional interview stage rarely adds proportional value. After a certain point, interviewers tend to repeat similar questions, assess the same competencies, or rely on subjective impressions rather than new data. More interviews can create the illusion of rigor without actually improving hiring outcomes.
Worse, too many decision-makers can lead to conflicting opinions, analysis paralysis, or decisions driven by consensus rather than evidence.
Every additional interviewer introduces more potential for unconscious bias. Without tightly structured interviews and clear evaluation criteria, multiple stages can amplify inconsistency rather than reduce risk.
Instead of improving fairness, excessive interviews can unintentionally reward candidates who interview well repeatedly rather than those best suited to perform in the role.
Lengthy recruitment processes are not just hard on candidates – they also drain internal resources. Hiring managers and interviewers spend significant time preparing for, conducting, and reviewing interviews. This can slow down teams, reduce productivity, and increase frustration, especially when roles remain open for long periods.
Over time, this can lead to interviewer burnout and a lack of engagement in the hiring process.
Candidates talk. A reputation for a long, disorganised, or overly demanding interview process can harm your employer brand. Even rejected candidates may leave with a negative impression, influencing future applicants and referrals.
A streamlined, respectful recruitment experience reflects well on an organisation, regardless of the final hiring outcome.
This is not an argument for rushed or careless hiring. Instead, it is a call for intentional design. Effective recruitment processes focus on a small number of well-structured stages, each with a clear purpose. Interviews should gather distinct information, be time-efficient, and respect both the candidate’s and the company’s time.
In hiring, more is not always better. A thoughtful, focused interview process is often the strongest signal of a company that knows what it needs and knows how to recognise it.
The Procurement Hive has deep procurement recruitment experience, adding significant value to your recruitment campaign. Visit our procurement recruitment page to find out more…
The Procurement Hive | Procurement Recruitment Services